The former NSA said another mistake was to not take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16
India missed an opportunity to “split Western Pakistan” both after the 1965 and 1971 wars, said former National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan, making the case that it is now difficult for India defeat terrorism without “eliminating” the terrorist state. Speaking at The Hindu Huddle’s opening session on Friday, Mr. Narayanan, who was known as a ‘hardliner’ on Pakistan in the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government as NSA (2005-2010), said that intelligence officials should have been better prepared for the current conflict that began with the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, after Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir’s speech the week before. In his speech to Pakistani lawmakers, Gen. Munir had played up religious differences as irreconcilable and propounded the “two-nation” theory.
At a session entitled “Balancing National Security with Political Expediency”, Mr. Narayanan and former Indian Envoy to the United Nations T.S. Tirumurti also criticised the international community for its response to the Pahalgam attack, where most countries called on India to “de-escalate” despite Indian being the victim of the terror attack in which 26 men were gunned down by terrorists belonging to the TRF (The Resistance Front).
“Both in 1965 and 1971 we made one serious mistake. We did not split Pakistan and divide it into a split Western Pakistan and split it into a set of principalities, which is what Pakistan is today,” Mr. Narayanan said, referring to insurgencies in the Balochistan and Khyber Pakthunkhwa provinces in Pakistan. He said that after the 1971 war, and creation of Bangladesh from what was East Pakistan, India thought Pakistan would have “learned a lesson”.
He said another mistake was not to take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16, adding that after the Mumbai 26/11 attack, he had himself taken responsibility for the intelligence failure.
At the beginning of the session, The Hindu’s Opinion Editor and Curator of The Hindu Huddle, Narayan Lakshman asked the audience to stand for a moment to recognise the “courage and sacrifices of the armed forces” and express their gratitude to them.
“We need to be careful, because you have now a leader of the Pakistan army, who is a firm believer, in the clash of civilizations,” Mr. Narayanan warned, saying that Gen Munir’s words were the kind of “war speech that I never thought that in the 21st century we would to listen from a leader, a person in uniform”.
At a briefing on May 8, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had said that the “communal rhetoric” by General Munir was possibly linked to the Pahalgam attack, where the victims were religiously identified before being killed, with the motive of setting of riots across India.
Speaking about the post-Pahalgam airstrikes on Pakistan led by the Indian Air Force on May 7, Mr. Tirumurti said that “Operation Sindoor” had “reset the rules of engagement with Pakistan on cross border terrorism”. He said India no longer needed to prove in each and every case that the terrorists had come from Pakistani soil, or whether they had been sponsored by Pakistan, unlike the case in previous attacks.
Criticising the international reaction to India’s actions, Mr. Tirumurti said that as envoy to the UN, he had seen up close how countries would skirt around the issue of “zero tolerance” for cross-border terrorism. “While they all condemned the terror attack, at the same time, all of them called out for restraint and de-escalation for regional stability etc….” Mr. Tirumurti said, asking why the US, UK, Gulf countries and others did not even call on Pakistan to take steps to investigate the attack’s linkages. “They were requesting India, which is the victim, not to go after the perpetrators, which is Pakistan.”
Mr. Narayanan said it was clear from his experience that “the rest of the world will not fight our war”. He said that India had hoped the US would come to its aid during previous wars with China and Pakistan including in 1962, and 1965 and 1971. “They came with a lot of advice, told us how we should alter our security arrangements within the country, but they produced nothing,” he said, praising Russian President Vladimir Putin for being “more favourable to India”. However, he added that India would need to “fight on its own”, not with the support of other countries.
The Hindu Huddle 2025 is presented by Sami-Sabinsa Group
Co-powered by: Government of Karnataka, Government of Telangana
State partner: Meghalaya tourism and Haryana government
Luxury car partner: Toyota
Radio partner: Radio City
Gift partner: Anand Prakash
Broadcast partner: Times Now
Outdoor media partner: Signpost India
The Hindu Huddle 2025: ‘Should have split Western Pakistan too during 1965, 1971 wars,’ says former NSA M.K. Narayanan
The former NSA said another mistake was to not take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16
India missed an opportunity to “split Western Pakistan” both after the 1965 and 1971 wars, said former National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan, making the case that it is now difficult for India defeat terrorism without “eliminating” the terrorist state. Speaking at The Hindu Huddle’s opening session on Friday, Mr. Narayanan, who was known as a ‘hardliner’ on Pakistan in the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government as NSA (2005-2010), said that intelligence officials should have been better prepared for the current conflict that began with the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, after Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir’s speech the week before. In his speech to Pakistani lawmakers, Gen. Munir had played up religious differences as irreconcilable and propounded the “two-nation” theory.
At a session entitled “Balancing National Security with Political Expediency”, Mr. Narayanan and former Indian Envoy to the United Nations T.S. Tirumurti also criticised the international community for its response to the Pahalgam attack, where most countries called on India to “de-escalate” despite Indian being the victim of the terror attack in which 26 men were gunned down by terrorists belonging to the TRF (The Resistance Front).
“Both in 1965 and 1971 we made one serious mistake. We did not split Pakistan and divide it into a split Western Pakistan and split it into a set of principalities, which is what Pakistan is today,” Mr. Narayanan said, referring to insurgencies in the Balochistan and Khyber Pakthunkhwa provinces in Pakistan. He said that after the 1971 war, and creation of Bangladesh from what was East Pakistan, India thought Pakistan would have “learned a lesson”.
He said another mistake was not to take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16, adding that after the Mumbai 26/11 attack, he had himself taken responsibility for the intelligence failure.
At the beginning of the session, The Hindu’s Opinion Editor and Curator of The Hindu Huddle, Narayan Lakshman asked the audience to stand for a moment to recognise the “courage and sacrifices of the armed forces” and express their gratitude to them.
“We need to be careful, because you have now a leader of the Pakistan army, who is a firm believer, in the clash of civilizations,” Mr. Narayanan warned, saying that Gen Munir’s words were the kind of “war speech that I never thought that in the 21st century we would to listen from a leader, a person in uniform”.
At a briefing on May 8, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had said that the “communal rhetoric” by General Munir was possibly linked to the Pahalgam attack, where the victims were religiously identified before being killed, with the motive of setting of riots across India.
Speaking about the post-Pahalgam airstrikes on Pakistan led by the Indian Air Force on May 7, Mr. Tirumurti said that “Operation Sindoor” had “reset the rules of engagement with Pakistan on cross border terrorism”. He said India no longer needed to prove in each and every case that the terrorists had come from Pakistani soil, or whether they had been sponsored by Pakistan, unlike the case in previous attacks.
Criticising the international reaction to India’s actions, Mr. Tirumurti said that as envoy to the UN, he had seen up close how countries would skirt around the issue of “zero tolerance” for cross-border terrorism. “While they all condemned the terror attack, at the same time, all of them called out for restraint and de-escalation for regional stability etc….” Mr. Tirumurti said, asking why the US, UK, Gulf countries and others did not even call on Pakistan to take steps to investigate the attack’s linkages. “They were requesting India, which is the victim, not to go after the perpetrators, which is Pakistan.”
Mr. Narayanan said it was clear from his experience that “the rest of the world will not fight our war”. He said that India had hoped the US would come to its aid during previous wars with China and Pakistan including in 1962, and 1965 and 1971. “They came with a lot of advice, told us how we should alter our security arrangements within the country, but they produced nothing,” he said, praising Russian President Vladimir Putin for being “more favourable to India”. However, he added that India would need to “fight on its own”, not with the support of other countries.
The Hindu Huddle 2025 is presented by Sami-Sabinsa Group
Co-powered by: Government of Karnataka, Government of Telangana
The Hindu Huddle 2025: ‘Should have split Western Pakistan too during 1965, 1971 wars,’ says former NSA M.K. Narayanan
The former NSA said another mistake was to not take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16
India missed an opportunity to “split Western Pakistan” both after the 1965 and 1971 wars, said former National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan, making the case that it is now difficult for India defeat terrorism without “eliminating” the terrorist state. Speaking at The Hindu Huddle’s opening session on Friday, Mr. Narayanan, who was known as a ‘hardliner’ on Pakistan in the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government as NSA (2005-2010), said that intelligence officials should have been better prepared for the current conflict that began with the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, after Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir’s speech the week before. In his speech to Pakistani lawmakers, Gen. Munir had played up religious differences as irreconcilable and propounded the “two-nation” theory.
At a session entitled “Balancing National Security with Political Expediency”, Mr. Narayanan and former Indian Envoy to the United Nations T.S. Tirumurti also criticised the international community for its response to the Pahalgam attack, where most countries called on India to “de-escalate” despite Indian being the victim of the terror attack in which 26 men were gunned down by terrorists belonging to the TRF (The Resistance Front).
“Both in 1965 and 1971 we made one serious mistake. We did not split Pakistan and divide it into a split Western Pakistan and split it into a set of principalities, which is what Pakistan is today,” Mr. Narayanan said, referring to insurgencies in the Balochistan and Khyber Pakthunkhwa provinces in Pakistan. He said that after the 1971 war, and creation of Bangladesh from what was East Pakistan, India thought Pakistan would have “learned a lesson”.
He said another mistake was not to take “pre-emptive action” using special forces after General Munir’s speech of April 16, adding that after the Mumbai 26/11 attack, he had himself taken responsibility for the intelligence failure.
At the beginning of the session, The Hindu’s Opinion Editor and Curator of The Hindu Huddle, Narayan Lakshman asked the audience to stand for a moment to recognise the “courage and sacrifices of the armed forces” and express their gratitude to them.
“We need to be careful, because you have now a leader of the Pakistan army, who is a firm believer, in the clash of civilizations,” Mr. Narayanan warned, saying that Gen Munir’s words were the kind of “war speech that I never thought that in the 21st century we would to listen from a leader, a person in uniform”.
At a briefing on May 8, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had said that the “communal rhetoric” by General Munir was possibly linked to the Pahalgam attack, where the victims were religiously identified before being killed, with the motive of setting of riots across India.
Speaking about the post-Pahalgam airstrikes on Pakistan led by the Indian Air Force on May 7, Mr. Tirumurti said that “Operation Sindoor” had “reset the rules of engagement with Pakistan on cross border terrorism”. He said India no longer needed to prove in each and every case that the terrorists had come from Pakistani soil, or whether they had been sponsored by Pakistan, unlike the case in previous attacks.
Criticising the international reaction to India’s actions, Mr. Tirumurti said that as envoy to the UN, he had seen up close how countries would skirt around the issue of “zero tolerance” for cross-border terrorism. “While they all condemned the terror attack, at the same time, all of them called out for restraint and de-escalation for regional stability etc….” Mr. Tirumurti said, asking why the US, UK, Gulf countries and others did not even call on Pakistan to take steps to investigate the attack’s linkages. “They were requesting India, which is the victim, not to go after the perpetrators, which is Pakistan.”
Mr. Narayanan said it was clear from his experience that “the rest of the world will not fight our war”. He said that India had hoped the US would come to its aid during previous wars with China and Pakistan including in 1962, and 1965 and 1971. “They came with a lot of advice, told us how we should alter our security arrangements within the country, but they produced nothing,” he said, praising Russian President Vladimir Putin for being “more favourable to India”. However, he added that India would need to “fight on its own”, not with the support of other countries.
The Hindu Huddle 2025 is presented by Sami-Sabinsa Group
Co-powered by: Government of Karnataka, Government of Telangana
NO COMMENT